It takes time: How brief mentoring relationships
impact academic performance
|
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE… This study showed that a one-semester long school-based mentoring program that aimed to help students transition from elementary to middle school resulted in worse reading grades for students in their first semester of middle school, with neutral effects on other outcomes. The study also found that mentoring effects were more positive at an 8-week follow-up than a 3-week follow-up, perhaps showing that mentoring initially causes a disruption in students’ lives. This study is in line with prior research showing that brief mentoring relationships can be more harmful than helpful. This study reinforces the need for mentoring programs to have a method for reliably evaluating their program and their mentors, including through measuring practical outcomes for students such as grades and behavior problems, as well as measuring mentor competence. In addition, programs need to evaluate possible negative effects of the mentoring. Monitoring potential negative impacts may be especially important for school-based mentoring programs that typically involve brief mentoring relationships that are known to have drawbacks. |
|
THE DETAILS… What was the purpose of this study? Who were the
mentors? What type of mentoring was provided? What did the
researchers find?
Source: McQuillin, S., Smith, B., & Strait, G. (2011). Randomized evaluation of a single-semester transitional mentoring program for first-year middle school students: A cautionary result for brief, school-based mentoring programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 7, 844–859. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20475 |
Back
